The Mercedes SLK concept predates its larger sibling, the SL, by just two years. Back in 1954, the original SLK, though not named as such, emerged as the 190SL. This model, much like the modern Slk 250 Mercedes, was built upon the underpinnings of a smaller sedan, sharing minimal components with the prestigious and iconic 300SL “Gullwing.” Interestingly, the 190SL significantly outsold its more glamorous counterpart, becoming a popular choice, especially in coastal regions, as a stylish and comfortable vehicle for affluent individuals.
The 190SL produced 104 horsepower from its 1.9-liter four-cylinder engine. Even for its time, performance wasn’t its primary focus, but its attractive design and Mercedes-Benz prestige resonated with the intended clientele. Today’s SLK 250 Mercedes, particularly the 1.8-liter, 201-horsepower variant, can be seen as a direct descendant of this philosophy. Recently, I found myself with some free time in Palm Beach and decided to rent an SLK 250 Mercedes to experience it firsthand. Having driven previous SLK generations, including testing an SLK200 at the Nürburgring, I was eager to see if the latest model still leaned towards the “touring” side of the sport-touring spectrum.
Pricing and Market Positioning of the SLK 250
The SLK 250 Mercedes I tested had an as-tested price of $50,195, a step up from the base MSRP of $44,875. This increase was due to desirable options like the seven-speed automatic transmission, upgraded 18-inch wheels, and the Premium Package, which included heated seats, a Harman/Kardon sound system, and other comfort features. One could perceive this price point as high for a four-cylinder car, placing it between the more powerful Ford Mustang GT convertible ($41,800) and the significantly more performance-oriented Chevrolet Corvette convertible ($59,000). However, this perspective overlooks the SLK 250 Mercedes’s core appeal. In locales like Palm Beach, owning a Mercedes-Benz is often seen as an unspoken prerequisite for social acceptance. In a market where a well-equipped Honda Accord can reach $32,000 and an Acura TLX approaches $50,000, the SLK 250 Mercedes presents a relatively accessible entry point into the Mercedes-Benz world, offering a certain level of prestige and valet treatment at upscale venues.
Interior and Comfort: What to Expect Inside the SLK 250
However, the price doesn’t translate into an overwhelmingly luxurious interior. While brushed-aluminum trim is abundant, the standard MB-Tex upholstery might not deeply impress passengers unless you opt for one of the pricier designo leather upgrades. On the positive side, the SLK 250 Mercedes offers a surprisingly spacious cabin, particularly wider than previous SLK generations. While a bit more legroom would be welcome, the standard “Panorama” smoked-glass roof provides ample headroom, even for taller occupants.
Practicality and Usability of the SLK 250 Convertible
As a vehicle for effortlessly navigating between hotels and fine dining establishments, the SLK 250 Mercedes excels. The retractable hardtop operates smoothly, opening or closing in approximately 30 seconds. With the top down, trunk space is reduced, but still sufficient for a carry-on suitcase. Essentially, if a bag fits in an overhead airplane bin, it will likely fit in the SLK 250 Mercedes trunk, though fitting two might be a challenge. The climate control system proves effective even for a larger vehicle, and the optional “Logic 7” Harman/Kardon sound system is a worthwhile investment. It delivers clear and powerful audio even with the top down at highway speeds. During a late-night drive, I enjoyed the Miami Vice soundtrack through this system, enhancing the open-top cruising experience.
Engine and Transmission: Performance of the SLK 250
Paired with the standard six-speed manual transmission, the SLK 250 Mercedes’s low-pressure turbo engine likely provides adequate power. However, with the optional seven-speed torque-converter automatic, a more assertive foot is needed to keep pace with traffic.
In its default setting, the transmission starts in second gear, a traditional Mercedes-Benz characteristic. Initial acceleration can feel sluggish, but once underway, gear changes are swift. The 2-3 upshift even produces a sporty ignition cut-and-pop sound, reminiscent of the Volkswagen GTI. A console button allows switching to “manual” mode with steering wheel-mounted paddles, but the noticeable delay between paddle input and gear change diminishes the manual shifting experience. The SLK 250 Mercedes’s automatic algorithms prioritize fuel efficiency, often upshifting to seventh gear at speeds as low as 30 mph, where the turbocharger quietly maintains momentum at around 900rpm.
Fuel Economy: Is the SLK 250 Efficient?
Despite the smaller engine and the transmission’s inclination for upshifting, the SLK 250 Mercedes is not a fuel economy champion. Rental car usage might contribute to this, but even with conscious efforts to drive economically, I only achieved 23.6 mpg over a 100-mile stretch of relaxed driving. My Porsche Boxster, with a larger 3.2-liter, 264-horsepower flat-six engine, surpasses this figure. It’s also plausible that the SLK 350 Mercedes, with its 302-horsepower V-6, could achieve similar or better fuel economy. Combined with the diesel-like rattle from the direct-injected four-cylinder engine at idle, the case for upgrading to the 3.5-liter V6 model, despite the price increase, becomes compelling. The enhanced power would simply be an added bonus.
Handling and Ride Comfort: Touring vs. Sports Roadster
Nine years prior, I lapped the Nürburgring in 9:19 in the SLK 250 Mercedes’s predecessor, a Euro-spec, 163-horsepower SLK200 with an automatic transmission, on my seventh lap (bridge-to-gantry time). In my assessment, that SLK struck a favorable balance between handling and ride quality, arguably more appealing to most buyers than the contemporary Porsche Boxster or BMW Z4. The current SLK 250 Mercedes leans more towards comfort, perhaps to the detriment of its sporting character. The steering offers minimal feel or feedback, replaced by a smooth heaviness that might be interpreted as “sporty” by typical SUV owners, but doesn’t inspire aggressive cornering. The chassis and rigid body structure effectively absorb even significant road imperfections, suggesting that firmer springs and a more direct steering connection could enhance the driving dynamics. As it stands, the SLK 250 Mercedes is not intended for track use. It prioritizes comfort, mirroring the current Mercedes-Benz SL, and feels larger and less agile than previous SLK models.
Conclusion: The SLK 250 – A Stylish Cruiser
It’s easy to feel a touch of disappointment with the SLK 250 Mercedes, knowing Mercedes-Benz’s capacity to create exceptional sports cars. The SLS Black Series serves as a testament to their capabilities, often considered superior to many vehicles regardless of price. Mercedes-Benz possesses the know-how to build an emotionally engaging SLK, but they consciously chose a different path. For your $50,000, you receive a faithful homage to the original 190SL. It’s sufficiently stylish, adequately comfortable, and ensures prominent parking at upscale venues, even alongside Ferraris and Rolls-Royces. Its shortcomings – not being particularly fast, exceptionally capable, or thrilling to drive – are largely irrelevant to its target demographic. Enthusiasts might still prefer a Porsche Boxster, but for those seeking the essence of the original 190SL – stylish open-top cruising and social cachet – the SLK 250 Mercedes remains a compelling option.
